Showing posts with label trends. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trends. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

2012, here I come!


Now that we are almost a week into the new year, and as we wait for the holidays to make their prolonged exit and things to get back to normal, Carli’s Angels wants to give you something fun to chew on.  Enjoy loves, like I am my brie and diet coke.

As the year came to a close, many a media outlet was making attempts to cleverly synthesize all of the happenings in 2011.  The world experienced natural disasters, political upheaval, increasing pharma, etc.  The New York Times created a list of '75 things New Yorkers were talking about in 2011’, and by New Yorkers they mostly meant the Western World.  They likely cannot help their egocentrism so we can just let that one slide ;)

I noticed something while looking through this entertainment-meets-culture-meets-human-interest compilation: while there seems to be a very weak connection between the death of Bin Laden and Qadaffi and breakout movies like Bridesmaids, there was a cohesiveness to 2011 that cannot be denied.  The common thread seems to be a ‘fed-up, back to reality’ attitude, and what a breath of fresh air indeed. 

After a decade of war, Bin Laden is finally captured and killed.  While it’s hard to imagine that finding the most infamous man in the world in a relatively limited area could be such a feat, America and Bin Laden’s own people—tormented for years under his reign—have finally been granted that closure.  In our own political arena, the recent Iowa caucus results strongly hint at the desire to move away from a dual party system.  Ron Paul is the closest thing to a third-party candidate that has stood a likely chance of winning the nomination since what? 18blahblah…I’m no classical historian, but I know enough to realize the weight and excitement of his success for a country that keeps being promised change only to see regression if anything.

Art imitated life for myself and the rest of the nation in 2011.  The biggest movies of the year were all underdog stories that showcased the power of the human spirit.  Kristin Wiig was already the embodiment of modern physical comedy and self-deprecation for the sake of humor.  And then she was so believable as the late 20s/30-something trying to push through all of life’s setbacks to find the happiness she deserves.  Charlize Theron played a similar, albeit darker role in Young Adult; if you haven’t seen it yet I strongly suggest you do.  Theron’s climactic outburst in which she calls the wife of the man she’s still in love with after 18 years a ‘f**king bitch’ and then tells her she’s joking and sarcastically mocks her sweater, classic.  If someone has to look ‘unstable’ to mainstream society in order to express their frustration, it’s probably worth it.  While people may pretend to be shocked, the majority adores this behavior.  It’s natural and cathartic, and perhaps honesty and relatedness is what has been lacking until recently.  
Take the most popular new sitcoms for the 18-35 demographic: Two Broke Girls and New Girl.  Zooey Deschanel may have been trying too hard, okay she totally was but at least she isn’t Blake Lively.  Emma Stone gets my vote for best real girl/role model/talent of the year, because more than ever there is a premium placed on authenticity.

Stay tuned, because tomorrow I’m bringing you a Memphis-spin on 2011 and where it brings us for 20twelve. Xoxo

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Target? Bulls-Eye.


Fashion and trends are a strange phenomenon.  Dating back almost as long as the birth of the nation, every twenty years or so brings about a drastic change in clothing styles.  However, 1992 up to the present has ushered in few profound differences aside from technologically.  How can a period that has given life to personal computers, cell phones, mp3 players, email, social media and ‘i’ everything also be such a stagnant time for something as rudimentary as textiles and buttons?  Not even mass globalization has managed to have much of an effect on burgeoning cuts and colors.

Many use the obvious Madonna/ Lady Gaga comparison as a way to showcase just how little has changed pre-Clinton administration.  The fact is, such examples are everywhere.  As entertainment magazines push their Nirvana 20th Anniversary issues off the shelves, one pauses briefly to realize not much has shifted post Cobain’s tragic death.  Pretty Woman and Jurassic Park could, and have been re-released with different characters and a glossier sheen today without any distinct complexities or decade-revealing clues.  Julia Roberts is no different than Reese Witherspoon in Legally Blonde: a classic underdog who achieves unlikely dreams with the help of one of two people (usually the leading men) who believe in them.  Jurassic Park is Avatar without the recent tech-savvy.  One might argue that My Fair Lady and King Kong were part of the same vein as the former.  Concerning basic plot line, this is a fairly accurate statement; however, it is inconceivable that anyone would mistake either of the oldest films as occurring in any other time period than they did.  Such is not the case regarding the previous examples—it is as if no time passed between them.

There has been speculation that the lack of distinctive change in pop culture, namely music and films, can be attributed to the lengthy careers that stars have attained through studio deals and iron-clad contracts.  Yet, has this not always been the case to a certain extent?  If someone was an icon fifty years ago, they were in the spotlight for longer than their 15 minutes.  Popularity sells and thus will be in demand for as long as it is what the public wants.  Before Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt, there was Robert De Niro and Jack Nicholson, and earlier Frank Sinatra and John Wayne—not to mention the female leads!  What’s different is the length of time the same exact acting style and appearance are remaining desirable on a mass level.  Earlier actors and performers had to mold to what the trends insisted.  The best example of the new age, Groundhog Day style mentality is Jennifer Aniston.  Nothing about Aniston, from her silky straight dirty blonde coif to her self-deprecating, if not downright awkward ‘pretty’ girl humor, has been tampered with since her days as Rachel Greene on Friends.  Clearly Jen has benefited from following the age-old ‘if it ain’t broke’ mentality shared by many of her counterparts.

The newest form of innovation involves nothing completely original, but instead borrows from a myriad of old styles, themes, concept and successes.  Hip-hop, even from its earliest days has been an art of collaboration and heavy sampling.  The heightened popularity of house music, remixes, djs and performers like Girl Talk—who have built their fame entirely on piecing together samples of other artists’ work—speaks for itself.  Maybe there really is not anything new under the sun, but does that mean everyone in the fashion, design and entertainment industry should completely throw in the towel?  Perhaps the jeans and t-shirts sensibility is the only place left to turn to for comfort and predictability amid the rest of the tumultuous political and economic landscape.  Designers working throughout the 1980s and prior to that time were creating in a vacuum; the nation’s socioeconomic landscape was much simpler.  Along with the internet and ipads came a constant connect and awareness which holds power but also instills a weariness and at times, a fear.  Pair such a widespread knowledge with a world that moves equally fast, and people on the whole no longer yearn for progression in every facet of life. 

Some arenas have been best determined more stagnant, and it naturally follows that clothing—something which tyrannical leaders or the DOW cannot force us to change—would stay much as it had been before: before technology started to outrun the human intellect.  Even the way in which Americans protest the negative changes occurring around them is on replay, as the Occupy movement bears a striking resemblance to the late 1960s and 70s counterculture era.  And the ultimate irony?  As fashion and culture lay scarcely touched, style enthusiasts seem more involved and enthused than ever before in the publicity and hype of that which is ‘nouveau’.  Perhaps blogging and twitter accounts have made it all too easy to share our opinions; and yet, who are these authors but messengers of what has been labeled cool and desirable by corporations. 

The Targets, Victoria Secrets, Starbucks, IO Metros and Banana Republics: these are the brands by whom trends are ignited and just as easily, stifled.  When such a small pool of stores holds as much influence as these and other mall/ strip mall giants, it only makes sense that corporate heads would push to maintain that monopoly by constantly reassuring the public that their way is the best way and needs no renovation.  Are comfort and economics edging out the genuine newness that Americans have always been known for; or, is it maybe just the fact that the status quo pleases the masses for the time being and no one is suffering for it?  Cliches aside, time will truly tell where fashion ventures or does not venture.

Here's to you J-Aniston...don't think that just b/c you're boring I haven't seen every episode of Friends 20 times.  I watch for Phoebe and Joey, but still...

Thanks to Miss Brittany Koole and Vanity Fair magazine for her/ their suggestion to write on such an engrossing topic; for some of her very own wisdom and wit, do see: 'To be titled at some point when I'm feeling creative...'.  As always I greatly encourage any and all comments and feedback.  Y-O-U are my W-H-Y!  Here's to a wonderful weekend--it's almost here so power on :)  Merry almost Merry and I'll see some of you cuties soon!

XO XHOE,
Carls-in-Charge